On 12/11/15, 13:24, "Alexey Khoroshilov" <khoroshilov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Even if dev->driver is null because we are being removed, >it is safer to not leave device locked. > >Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org). > >Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@xxxxxxxxx> >--- > drivers/acpi/nfit.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Looks good, thanks! Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx> > >diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c >index e7ed39bab97d..aa45d4802707 100644 >--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c >+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c >@@ -1810,7 +1810,7 @@ static void acpi_nfit_notify(struct acpi_device >*adev, u32 event) > if (!dev->driver) { > /* dev->driver may be null if we're being removed */ > dev_dbg(dev, "%s: no driver found for dev\n", __func__); >- return; >+ goto out_unlock; > } > > if (!acpi_desc) { >-- >1.9.1 > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html