On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:57:19PM +0100, Christophe Ricard wrote: > I believe changes done in this patch take benefit of another existing > function used in acpi gsi context that is doing the > job as expected. > > Do you still believe acpi_dev_irq_flags is more appropriate ? I don't have strong feelings about that. I just wanted to point out there already exists such function. However, if you do use acpi_gsi_get_irq_type() I think it should be placed to the same file as acpi_dev_irq_flags(). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
