On Saturday, December 05, 2015 08:36:22 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 06:24:05PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:49:17PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > >> The users of BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER have no chance to do any cleanup in case of > > >> a probe failure. In the result there might be problems, such as some resources > > >> that had been allocated will continue to be allocated and therefore lead to a > > >> resource leak. > > >> > > >> Introduce a new notification to inform the subscriber that ->probe() failed. Do > > >> the same in case of failed device_bind_driver() call. > > > > > > Ugh, I hate all these notifiers, but this one does make sense... > > > > Yeah, I'm not a fan of them either. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > You meant Acked-by, didn't you? > > Either works :) Thanks! Andy, what about if I put patches [1-6/9] into my queue for v4.5 now and the remaining ones will wait for Vinod to comment? Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
