On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 03:45:11PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 05:02:01PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> If DMI lists a hotkey that we don't recognize, log and ignore it > >> instead of trying to map it to keycode 0. I haven't seen this happen, > >> but it will help maintain the key map in the future and it will help > >> avoid sending bogus events. > >> > >> This also improves the message that we log when we get an unknown key > >> event. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > > > > Please include the individual patch changelogs here under --- in the patch > > itself - this helps me build confidence that I am indeed looking at the right > > patch and the expected changes are here. > > Will do in the future -- different maintainers have different > preferences here, I think. Oh really? This is the documented process in Documentation/SubmittingPatches Section 14) The canonical patch format... -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
