On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@xxxxxxx> wrote: [..] > If we want to be more paranoid about buggy FW when we're comparing old > and new tables, we could compare based on the length of the old and new > tables since we have both pieces of information. That would let you catch > the case where a table size changes during a hotplug event or whenever the > _FIT is processed. Since you were comparing based on structure size instead > of header length, I didn't change that. Comparing that the size didn't change sounds like a good incremental change to tag on later. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
