On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 15:18:45 -0600
Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 11/19/15 06:08, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:47:25 -0700
> > Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Suravee,
> >
> > Sorry it took so long to get to this series. Comments below.
>
> No worry.
>
> >
> >> This patch introduces pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(), which returns
> >> the MSI domain of the specified PCI host bridge with DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI
> >> bus token. Then, it is assigned to pci device.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> >> drivers/pci/probe.c | 2 ++
> >> include/linux/pci.h | 7 +++++++
> >> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> >> index a32ba75..0e21ef4 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> >> @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@
> >>
> >> #include <linux/delay.h>
> >> #include <linux/init.h>
> >> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> >> #include <linux/pci.h>
> >> +#include <linux/msi.h>
> >> #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h>
> >> #include <linux/module.h>
> >> #include <linux/pci-aspm.h>
> >> @@ -689,6 +691,17 @@ static struct acpi_bus_type acpi_pci_bus = {
> >> .cleanup = pci_acpi_cleanup,
> >> };
> >>
> >> +struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
> >> +{
> >> + struct irq_domain *dom = NULL;
> >> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = pci_msi_get_fwnode(&bus->dev);
> >> +
> >> + if (fwnode)
> >> + dom = irq_find_matching_fwnode(fwnode,
> >> + DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI);
> >> + return dom;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >
> > Given this, I really question the need for what you define in patch #1
> > to be standalone. It is only used by ACPI (DT has its own private
> > helpers), and it is so far unlikely that it will be of any use for
> > other firmware interfaces.
> >
> > My suggestion is to get rid of pci_msi_get_fwnode() and move the
> > registration helper into this file. That'd be much simpler.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > M.
> >
>
> Ok, I'll take care of this. I assume the rest of the patches looks ok.
I still need to finish going through it (I have minor comments so far
on some of the other patches), but I want to get the core ACPI stuff in
shape before doing anything else.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
