On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/12/2015 4:56 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> - if (acpi_irq_balance || !link->irq.active) { >>> + if ((acpi_irq_balance || !link->irq.active) && (irq < ACPI_MAX_IRQS)) { >>> /* >> >>> - * Select the best IRQ. This is done in reverse to promote >>> - * the use of IRQs 9, 10, 11, and >15. >>> + * Select the best IRQ. This is done in reverse to >>> + * promote the use of IRQs 9, 10, 11, and >15. >> >> What was changed here? > > See your comments here. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/8/231 So, you refer to narrow commentary blocks, right? It was about *new* code, leave as is what was before your patch series. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html