On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 13:18 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> > There is a board in the wild, i.e. Intel Galileo Gen2, that has ACPI > >> > enumerated > >> > devices behind I2C bus. > >> > >> Lee, since Wolfram is going to apply patches 1 and 5, how could we > >> proceed with the rest? Patches are indeed build independent, though > >> they are unified by enabling logically piece-by-piece. It would be > >> great if you think you may apply them to your v4.4 queue. > > > > So we're just waiting for Thierry's Ack now, right? > > That's right. Either Ack, or he might apply patch by himself. It > wouldn't be harmful in any case. I'll give him another few days. If we don't hear anything then I'll apply them all bar the PWM patch. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
