On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 10:40 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:22:24PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote: > > @@ -545,10 +545,15 @@ static int einj_error_inject(u32 type, u32 flags, u64 > > param1, u64 param2, > > /* > > * Disallow crazy address masks that give BIOS leeway to pick > > * injection address almost anywhere. Insist on page or > > - * better granularity and that target address is normal RAM. > > + * better granularity and that target address is normal RAM or > > + * NVDIMM. > > */ > > - pfn = PFN_DOWN(param1 & param2); > > - if (!page_is_ram(pfn) || ((param2 & PAGE_MASK) != PAGE_MASK)) > > + base_addr = param1 & param2; > > + size = (~param2) + 1; > > Hmm, I missed this last time: why are the brackets there? > > AFAIK, bitwise NOT has a higher precedence than addition. Yes, the brackets are not necessary. I put them as self-explanatory of the precedence. Shall I remove them, and send you an updated patch? Thanks, -Toshi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
