It looks patch 08 is not listed on the https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-acpi/list/. I just re-sent it, hope it could reach the mailing list this time. I'll also send it in attachment style via private route to you. Thanks and best regards -Lv > From: linux-acpi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-acpi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Zheng, Lv > Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 10:04 AM > > I was using linux-pm.git/linux-next base which I downloaded a week ago. > Maybe the conflict was caused by the fast-path ACPICA table fix merged after my downloading. > Let me check again. > > Thanks and best regards > -Lv > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 5:04 AM > > > > On Monday, October 19, 2015 10:25:32 AM Lv Zheng wrote: > > > ACPICA commit 0dd68e16274cd38224aa4781eddc57dc2cbaa108 > > > > > > The quit/exit commands shouldn't invoke acpi_terminate_debugger() and > > > acpi_terminate() right in the user command loop, because when the debugger > > > exits, the kernel ACPI subsystem shouldn't be terminated (acpi_terminate()) > > > and the debugger should only be terminated by its users > > > (acpi_terminate_debugger()) rather than being terminated itself. Leaving such > > > invocations causes kernel panic when the debugger is shipped in the Linux > > > kernel. > > > > > > This patch fixes this issue. Lv Zheng. > > > > > > Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/0dd68e16 > > > Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > This patch does not apply for me on top of the current mainline. > > > > What tree is it applicable to? > > > > Thanks, > > Rafael > > N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{�i�b�{ay� ʇڙ�,j ��f���h���z� �w��� > > ���j:+v���w�j�m���� ����zZ+�����ݢj"��!�i ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
