Re: [PATCH V2 6/6] gicv2m: acpi: Introducing GICv2m ACPI support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Tomasz,

Thanks for the feedback.

On 10/15/2015 1:15 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
[..]
@@ -138,6 +140,11 @@ static int gicv2m_irq_gic_domain_alloc(struct
irq_domain *domain,
          fwspec.param[0] = 0;
          fwspec.param[1] = hwirq - 32;
          fwspec.param[2] = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING;
+    } else if (is_fwnode_irqchip(domain->parent->fwnode)) {
+        fwspec.fwnode = domain->parent->fwnode;
+        fwspec.param_count = 2;
+        fwspec.param[0] = hwirq;
+        fwspec.param[1] = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
How about just:
fwspec.param[1] = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING;

Right.


      } else {
          return -EINVAL;
      }
@@ -255,6 +262,8 @@ static void gicv2m_teardown(void)
          kfree(v2m->bm);
          iounmap(v2m->base);
          of_node_put(to_of_node(v2m->fwnode));
+        if (is_fwnode_irqchip(v2m->fwnode))
+            irq_domain_free_fwnode(v2m->fwnode);
          kfree(v2m);
      }
  }
@@ -359,6 +368,8 @@ static int __init gicv2m_init_one(struct
fwnode_handle *fwnode,

      if (to_of_node(fwnode))
          name = to_of_node(fwnode)->name;
+    else
+        name = irq_domain_get_irqchip_fwnode_name(fwnode);

      pr_info("Frame %s: range[%#lx:%#lx], SPI[%d:%d]\n", name,
          (unsigned long)res->start, (unsigned long)res->end,
@@ -415,3 +426,86 @@ int __init gicv2m_of_init(struct device_node
*node, struct irq_domain *parent)
          gicv2m_teardown();
      return ret;
  }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+static int acpi_num_msi;
+
+static struct fwnode_handle *gicv2m_get_fwnode(struct device *dev)
+{
+    struct v2m_data *data;
+
+    if (WARN_ON(acpi_num_msi <= 0))
+        return NULL;
+
+    /* We only return the fwnode of the first MSI frame. */
+    data = list_first_entry_or_null(&v2m_nodes,
+                    struct v2m_data, entry);
This can be one line and still fits within 80 characters.

Ok.

+    if (!data)
+        return NULL;
+
+    return data->fwnode;
+}
+
+static int __init
+acpi_parse_madt_msi(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
+            const unsigned long end)
+{
+    int ret;
+    struct resource res;
+    u32 spi_start = 0, nr_spis = 0;
+    struct acpi_madt_generic_msi_frame *m;
+    struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = NULL;
+
+    m = (struct acpi_madt_generic_msi_frame *)header;
+    if (BAD_MADT_ENTRY(m, end))
+        return -EINVAL;
+
+    res.start = m->base_address;
+    res.end = m->base_address + 0x1000;
+
+    if (m->flags & ACPI_MADT_OVERRIDE_SPI_VALUES) {
+        spi_start = m->spi_base;
+        nr_spis = m->spi_count;
+
+        pr_info("ACPI overriding V2M MSI_TYPER (base:%u, num:%u)\n",
+            spi_start, nr_spis);
+    }
+
+    fwnode = irq_domain_alloc_fwnode((void *)m->base_address);
+    if (!fwnode) {
+        pr_err("Unable to allocate GICv2m domain token\n");
+        return -EINVAL;
+    }
+
+    ret = gicv2m_init_one(fwnode, spi_start, nr_spis, &res);
I case of error, we should call here:
irq_domain_free_fwnode(fwnode);

This should have already been handled when returning from the acpi_parse_madt_msi() in gicv2m_teardown() since we would need to iterate through all existing MSI frame to clean up.

+
+    return ret;
+}
+
+int __init gicv2m_acpi_init(struct irq_domain *parent)
+{
+    int ret;
+
+    if (acpi_num_msi > 0)
+        return 0;
+
+    acpi_num_msi =
acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_MSI_FRAME,
+                      acpi_parse_madt_msi, 0);
+
+    if (acpi_num_msi <= 0)
+        goto err_out;
If acpi_table_parse_madt return 0, then we don't need to call
gicv2m_teardown(). Instead we can simply return, optionally add some
pr_info. Well, gicv2m_teardown would do nothing, so this is just
cosmetic and up to you.

I'd be hesitate to add pr_info here since V2m is optional, we already print information for each frame found. I think I would just leave this one the way it is.

[..]
diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
index bae69e5..7398538 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
@@ -108,6 +108,12 @@ void gic_init(unsigned int nr, int start,

  int gicv2m_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct irq_domain
*parent);

+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
I think, we don't need this include here. You already added it to itq-gic.c

Right.

Thanks,
Suravee


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux