I'm thinking that AE_NOT_FOUND should not generate a warning, but any other exception should. > -----Original Message----- > From: Prarit Bhargava [mailto:prarit@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 8:57 AM > To: Moore, Robert; Wysocki, Rafael J; devel@xxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Zheng, Lv; Len Brown; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Box, David E > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: AcpiGetSleepTypeData: Failure to find \_Sx > should not result in a loud warning > > > > On 10/07/2015 11:52 AM, Moore, Robert wrote: > > It would be easy to remove (or partially remove) the warning. Hopefully > the calling code will handle AE_NOT_FOUND correctly. > > > > In the specific case of the \_Sx sleep states the code does handle the > AE_NOT_FOUND correctly. The issue is solely the warning being displayed > when there should be no warning. > > P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
