On Wed, 30 Sep 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > If the platform firmware was involved in the system resume that's > being completed, there is a concern that some devices might have > been reset by it and if those devices had the power.direct_complete > flag set during the preceding suspend transition, they may stay > in a reset-power-on state indefinitely (until they are runtime-resumed > and then suspended again). That may not be a big deal from the > individual device's perspective, but if the system is an SoC, it may > be prevented from entering deep SoC-wide low-power states on idle > because of that. > > To prevent that from happening, force a runtime resume for devices > with power.direct_complete set if the platform firmware was involved > in the resume transition currently in progress. > > Something similar was done by the ACPI PM domain, but regardless of > the platform firmware involvement, and the new mechanism should be > sufficient to replace that code, so drop it. Maybe I'm not reading patch 1/2 correctly, but it looks like an ordinary ACPI-based desktop PC will always believe the firmware was involved in an S3 sleep transition. If that's so then won't this change defeat all the work being done by people trying to prevent unneeded runtime resumes during system resume? direct_complete would be useful only on non-ACPI systems. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
