On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 01:19:59AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, September 14, 2015 05:37:36 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > > The current implementation hard codes the two supported channels so that > > "tx" is always 0 and "rx" is always 1. This is because there has been no > > suitable way in ACPI to name resources. > > > > With _DSD device properties we can finally do this: > > > > Device (SPI1) { > > Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate () { > > ... > > FixedDMA (0x0000, 0x0000, Width32bit) > > FixedDMA (0x0001, 0x0001, Width32bit) > > }) > > > > Name (_DSD, Package () { > > ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"), > > Package () { > > Package () {"dma-names", Package () {"tx", "rx"}} > > }, > > }) > > } > > > > The names "tx" and "rx" now provide index of the FixedDMA resource in > > question. > > > > Modify acpi_dma_request_slave_chan_by_name() so that it looks for > > "dma-names" property first and only then fall back using hardcoded indices. > > > > The DT "dma-names" binding that we reuse for ACPI is documented in > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This and the [1/2] both look reasonable to me, but I need an ACK from Vinod > for this one. Vinod, any comments? > > > --- > > drivers/dma/acpi-dma.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++-------- > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/acpi-dma.c b/drivers/dma/acpi-dma.c > > index 5a635646e05c..981a38fc4cb8 100644 > > --- a/drivers/dma/acpi-dma.c > > +++ b/drivers/dma/acpi-dma.c > > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ > > #include <linux/ioport.h> > > #include <linux/acpi.h> > > #include <linux/acpi_dma.h> > > +#include <linux/property.h> > > > > static LIST_HEAD(acpi_dma_list); > > static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_dma_lock); > > @@ -413,21 +414,29 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dma_request_slave_chan_by_index); > > * translate the names "tx" and "rx" here based on the most common case where > > * the first FixedDMA descriptor is TX and second is RX. > > * > > + * If the device has "dma-names" property the FixedDMA descriptor indices > > + * are retrieved based on those. Otherwise the function falls back using > > + * hardcoded indices. > > + * > > * Return: > > * Pointer to appropriate dma channel on success or an error pointer. > > */ > > struct dma_chan *acpi_dma_request_slave_chan_by_name(struct device *dev, > > const char *name) > > { > > - size_t index; > > - > > - if (!strcmp(name, "tx")) > > - index = 0; > > - else if (!strcmp(name, "rx")) > > - index = 1; > > - else > > - return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); > > + int index; > > + > > + index = device_property_match_string(dev, "dma-names", name); > > + if (index < 0) { > > + if (!strcmp(name, "tx")) > > + index = 0; > > + else if (!strcmp(name, "rx")) > > + index = 1; > > + else > > + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); > > + } > > > > + dev_dbg(dev, "found DMA channel \"%s\" at index %d\n", name, index); > > return acpi_dma_request_slave_chan_by_index(dev, index); > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dma_request_slave_chan_by_name); > > > > Thanks, > Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html