On 16/09/15 16:05, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 09/13/2015 10:02 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> [...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
>> index e6b7ed5..8a0b9c3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
>> @@ -41,7 +41,6 @@
>> #include <linux/irqchip.h>
>> #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
>> #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h>
>> -#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-acpi.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/cputype.h>
>> #include <asm/irq.h>
>> @@ -1177,7 +1176,7 @@ IRQCHIP_DECLARE(msm_qgic2, "qcom,msm-qgic2", gic_of_init);
>> #endif
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> -static phys_addr_t dist_phy_base, cpu_phy_base __initdata;
>> +static phys_addr_t cpu_phy_base __initdata;
>>
>> static int __init
>> gic_acpi_parse_madt_cpu(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
>> @@ -1205,60 +1204,56 @@ gic_acpi_parse_madt_cpu(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static int __init
>> -gic_acpi_parse_madt_distributor(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
>> - const unsigned long end)
>> +/* The things you have to do to just *count* something... */
>> +static int __init acpi_dummy_func(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
>> + const unsigned long end)
>> {
>> - struct acpi_madt_generic_distributor *dist;
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>>
>> - dist = (struct acpi_madt_generic_distributor *)header;
>> +static bool __init acpi_gic_redist_is_present(void)
>> +{
>> + return acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_REDISTRIBUTOR,
>> + acpi_dummy_func, 0) > 0;
>> +}
>>
>> - if (BAD_MADT_ENTRY(dist, end))
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> +static bool __init gic_validate_dist(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
>> + struct acpi_probe_entry *ape)
>> +{
>> + struct acpi_madt_generic_distributor *dist;
>> + dist = (struct acpi_madt_generic_distributor *)header;
>>
>> - dist_phy_base = dist->base_address;
>> - return 0;
>> + return (dist->version == ape->driver_data &&
>> + (dist->version != ACPI_MADT_GIC_VERSION_NONE ||
>> + !acpi_gic_redist_is_present()));
>>
>
> When I was rebasing the GICv3 patches on top of yours, I noticed
> that GICv3 will also needs to check the acpi_gic_redist_is_present(),
> can we move the code above to some common place, or just leave
> the code duplicate but self-contained?
Please keep it self-contained so far. We can "optimize" later.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
