Re: [PATCH] ACPI: tables: simplify acpi_parse_entries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 15/09/15 10:31, Sudeep Holla wrote:


On 15/09/15 00:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, September 14, 2015 04:14:46 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
acpi_parse_entries passes the table end pointer to the sub-table entry
handler. acpi_parse_entries itself could validate the end of an entry
against the table end using the length in the sub-table entry.

This patch adds the validation of the sub-table entry end using the
length field.This will help to eliminate the need to pass the table end
to the handlers.

Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>


[...]

I will respin the patch as per your suggestion but needs to go only
after Al's MADT patches.


Alternately we can retain passing table_end to the handlers for now.

Once Al's MADT series removes those BAD_GIC_ENTRY macros, there will be
no users of that second argument in subtable handlers and it can be
completely removed. Let me know your thoughts.

Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux