On 8/27/2015 1:04 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@xxxxxx> wrote: >> I know this seems like a nit but we've going to live with this stuff for >> a long time. > > Along those lines, Bob just came by my office and gave me a decisive > argument that I think trumps my ABI concerns, and one I'd be willing > to argue for 4.2 inclusion. Some BIOS implementers may do the work to > get the polarity correct others may just read the flag name and get it > wrong. Once that happens the field loses all meaning regardless of > whether Linux interprets it correctly. BIOS developers, BIOS testers, and the OS folks working with those teams will be grateful. Thanks, -- ljk -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
