Hi Lukasz,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:43:04AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> On 26/08/15 08:04, Anaczkowski, Lukasz wrote:
> > On Monday, August 3, 2015 8:26 PM
> > Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> v2: Fixed ARM64 syntax error
> >
> > Hi Marc,
> >
> > Does this patch look ok now?
No it does not, it seems to break arm64, I put together a fix
below. I do not think the way you handle the count increment
in acpi_parse_entries() is correct anyway, since you increment
it only if max_entries != 0, which changes mainline behaviour.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
-- >8 --
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index d98b866..ca5591d 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ gic_v2_acpi_init(struct acpi_table_header *table)
count = acpi_parse_entries(ACPI_SIG_MADT,
sizeof(struct acpi_table_madt),
table, &gic_proc, 1, 0);
- if (count <= 0) {
+ if (gic_proc.count <= 0) {
pr_err("No valid GICC entries exist\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -1117,7 +1117,7 @@ gic_v2_acpi_init(struct acpi_table_header *table)
count = acpi_parse_entries(ACPI_SIG_MADT,
sizeof(struct acpi_table_madt),
table, &gic_proc, 1, 0);
- if (count <= 0) {
+ if (gic_proc.count <= 0) {
pr_err("No valid GICD entries exist\n");
return -EINVAL;
} else if (count > 1) {
--
2.2.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
