Re: [PATCH v8 0/9] CPUFreq driver using CPPC methods

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, August 05, 2015 09:40:23 AM Ashwin Chaugule wrote:
> CPPC:
> ====
> 
> CPPC (Collaborative Processor Performance Control) is a new way to control CPU
> performance using an abstract continous scale as against a discretized P-state scale
> which is tied to CPU frequency only. It is defined in the ACPI 5.0+ spec. In brief,
> the basic operation involves:
> - OS makes a CPU performance request. (Can provide min and max tolerable bounds)
> 
> - Platform (such as BMC) is free to optimize request within requested bounds depending
> on power/thermal budgets etc.
> 
> - Platform conveys its decision back to OS
> 
> The communication between OS and platform occurs through another medium called (PCC)
> Platform communication Channel. This is a generic mailbox like mechanism which includes
> doorbell semantics to indicate register updates. See drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
> 
> This patchset introduces a CPPC based CPUFreq driver that works with existing governors
> such as ondemand. The CPPC table parsing and the CPPC communication semantics are
> abstracted into separate files to allow future CPPC based drivers to implement their
> own governors if required.
> 
> Initial patchsets included an adaptation of the PID governor from intel_pstate.c. However
> recent experiments led to extensive modifications of the algorithm to calculate CPU
> busyness. Until it is verified that these changes are worthwhile, the existing governors
> should provide for a good enough starting point for ARM64 servers.
> 
> Finer details about the PCC and CPPC spec are available in the latest ACPI 5.1
> specification.[2]
> 
> Testing:
> =======
> 
> This was tested on an SBSA compatible ARMv8 server with CPPCv2
> firmware running on a remote processor. I verified that each CPUs
> performance limits were detected and that new performance requests
> were made by the on-demand governor proportional to the load on each
> CPU. I also verified that using the acpi_processor driver correctly
> maps the physical CPU ids to logical CPU ids, which helps in picking
> up the proper _CPC details from a processor object, in the case where
> CPU physical ids may not be contiguous.
> 
> Changes since V7:
> - Simplied new kconfig options for PSS and idle.
> - Separated patch to enable acpi processor on ARM64.
> - Removed redundant kconfig cross deps on PCC.
> - Decoupled processor_perflib from new PSS kconfig option.
> 
> Changes since V6:
> - Separated PSS and CST from ACPI processor driver in two patches.
> - Made new Kconfig symbols auto selectable from Arch Kconfigs.
> 
> Changes since V5:
> - Checkpatch cleanups.
> - Change pss_init to pss_perf_init. Rec by Srinivas Pandruvada.
> - Explicit comment explaining why postcore_initcall to pcc mailbox.
> - Fold acpi_processor_syscore_init/exit into CONFIG_ACPI_CST.
> - Added patch with dummy functions used by ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU.
> 
> Changes since V4:
> - Misc cleanups. Addressed feedback from Rafael.
> - Made acpi_processor.c independent of C-states, P-states and others.
> - Per CPU scanning for _CPC is now made from acpi_processor.c
> - Added new Kconfig options for legacy C states and P states to enable future
> support for newer alternatives as defined in the ACPI spec 6.0.
> 
> Changes since V3:
> - Split CPPC backend methods into separate files.
> - Add frontend driver which plugs into existing CPUfreq governors.
> - Simplify PCC driver by moving communication space mapping and read/write
> 	into client drivers.
> 
> Changes since V2:
> - Select driver if !X86, since intel_pstate will use HWP extensions instead.
> - Added more comments.
> - Added Freq domain awareness and PSD parsing.
> 
> Changes since V1:
> - Create a new driver based on Dirks suggestion.
> - Fold in CPPC backend hooks into main driver.
> 
> Changes since V0: [1]
> - Split intel_pstate.c into a generic PID governor and platform specific backend.
> - Add CPPC accessors as PID backend.
> 
> [1] - http://lwn.net/Articles/608715/
> [2] - http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_5_1release.pdf
> [3] - https://patches.linaro.org/40705/
> 
> 
> Ashwin Chaugule (9):
>   PCC: Initialize PCC Mailbox earlier at boot
>   ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor driver
>   ACPI: Decouple ACPI idle and ACPI processor drivers
>   ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC
>   CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC
>   ACPI: Add weak routines for ACPI CPU Hotplug
>   CPPC: Probe for CPPC tables for each ACPI Processor object
>   PCC: Disable compilation by default
>   ACPI: Allow selection of the ACPI processor driver for ARM64

I've queued up [1-3/9] for 4.3, but I still have a couple of questions/comments
regarding [4/9] and the rest of the series (I'll respond to the patch messages
with those).

Thanks!


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux