On Wednesday, August 05, 2015 01:14:49 PM David Daney wrote: > On 08/05/2015 10:26 AM, David Daney wrote: > > On 08/05/2015 06:43 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > >> On 05.08.2015 15:48, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, August 04, 2015 04:01:59 PM David Daney wrote: > >>>> From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> Fixes the following build error when building drivers as modules: > >>>> > >>>> ERROR: "acpi_dev_prop_read_single" [drivers/net/phy/mdio-octeon.ko] > >>>> undefined! > >>>> ERROR: "acpi_dev_prop_read_single" > >>>> [drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/thunder_bgx.ko] undefined! > >>> > >>> Can you please tell me why the drivers in question use that function > >>> directly, although they aren't supposed to? > >>> > >>> Clearly, their authors had not tried to build them as modules or they > >>> would have noticed the problem at the development stage already. > >>> > >>> What would be wrong with using the generic device properties API > >>> instead? > >>> > >> Yes, you are right. We should use: > >> int device_property_read_u64_array(struct device *dev, const char > >> *propname, u64 *val, size_t nval); > >> > > > > Thanks all, for the review and suggestions. We we try the suggested > > approach and see how it goes... > > > > Actually I don't think device_property_read_u64_array() will work. > > We are traversing a reference to a different acpi_device via > acpi_dev_get_property_reference(), Why? > so there is no struct device * > available for a call to device_property_read_u64_array(). This looks > like a deficiency in the device_property_* framework, so for the time > being I guess we will call acpi_dev_get_property(), which is exported, > and decode the thing in the driver. Please don't. I'd like to understand what's missing. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
