On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Tomeu Vizoso
<tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Delay matches of platform devices until late_initcall, when we are sure
> that all built-in drivers have been registered already. This is needed
> to prevent deferred probes because of some drivers not having registered
> yet.
>
> The reason why only platform devices are delayed is that some other
> devices are expected to be probed earlier than late_initcall, for
> example, the system PNP driver needs to probe its devices in
> fs_initcall.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Move delay to platform.c
>
> drivers/base/platform.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> index 063f0ab15259..fcf654678e27 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
> /* For automatically allocated device IDs */
> static DEFINE_IDA(platform_devid_ida);
>
> +static bool enable_matches;
> +
> struct device platform_bus = {
> .init_name = "platform",
> };
> @@ -839,6 +841,15 @@ static int platform_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> struct platform_driver *pdrv = to_platform_driver(drv);
>
> + /*
> + * Delay matches of platform devices until late_initcall, when we are
> + * sure that all built-in drivers have been registered already. This
> + * is needed to prevent deferred probes because of some drivers
> + * not having registered yet.
> + */
> + if (!enable_matches)
> + return false;
> +
Having this as a global makes me nervous. I think it would be better
to be DT specific or per device some how. Perhaps use OF_POPULATED_BUS
flag as an additional test.
There could be non-DT platforms that rely on the initcall ordering and
moving all probes to late_initcall could change the ordering. I'm not
sure though.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
