Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] PCC: Enable PCC only when needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 04:28:43 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> On 21/07/15 15:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi Sudeep,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 20/07/15 23:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Monday, July 20, 2015 03:22:37 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 09/07/15 19:04, Ashwin Chaugule wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> CPPC is the first client to make use of the PCC Mailbox channel. So
> >>>>> enable it only when CPPC is also enabled.
> >>>>>
> >>>> This sounds like a reverse dependency to me. So if there's some client
> >>>> unrelated to CPPC using PCC, CPPC_LIB needs to be selected to enable PCC
> >>>> ?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> No.  The other client will need to select PCC too.
> >>
> >>
> >> Yes the PCC users/clients selecting PCC is fine and that's already
> >> done(i.e. ACPI_CPPC_LIB selects PCC). I still don't understand the need
> >> for this change, also how will other clients possibly select PCC which
> >> now depends on CPPC_LIB ? e.g. if we have
> >>
> >> config ACPI_XYZ_LIB
> >>          select PCC
> >>
> >> config ACPI_XYZ
> >>          select ACPI_XYZ_LIB
> >>
> >> Won't this shout warning: (ACPI_XYZ_LIB && ACPI_CPPC_LIB) selects PCC
> >> which has unmet direct dependencies (MAILBOX && ACPI && ACPI_CPPC_LIB)
> >> if ACPI_CPPC_LIB is not selected ?
> >
> > That depends on the "depends on" clauses used.  Selecting itself
> > doesn't cause any dependencies to appear.
> >
> 
> Agreed and I am absolutely fine with that. But if you look at this 
> patch, it does
> 
> config PCC
> 	bool "Platform Communication Channel Driver"
> 	depends on ACPI && ACPI_CPPC_LIB

My bad, I've evidently overlooked that.

If PPC is selected from ACPI_CPPC_LIB, the "depends on" above is
obviously not needed.

> I am fine with ACPI_CPPC_LIB selecting PCC which is already done in
> earlier patch. I am against making PCC depend on ACPI_CPPC_LIB.

OK, makes sense.  Sorry for the misunderstanding.

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux