Hi,
On 08/07/15 21:28, Ashwin Chaugule wrote:
On 8 July 2015 at 16:05, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 8 July 2015 at 15:55, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Ashwin,
[...]
Can you please just send the new version of the $subject patch alone for now?
Attached below. (hope that worked.)
Also I'm still unsure what the connection between _CST and CPPC is.
There isnt. But I'm missing where I've implied the dependency?
Perhaps the confusion is coming from the introduction of ACPI_CST in
this file. I could leave it as it is and just separate out the
ACPI_PSS bits. But I figured, while I'm at it, I'd introduce ACPI_CST,
since we know the LPI stuff is coming up soon as a CST alternative
anyway. So if you prefer, I can drop the CST bits and maybe Sudeep can
address that as part of his LPI patchset?
Correct, I will handle it as a prerequisite for introducing _LPI
support. I had posted an RFC long back, will revive those patches and
repost them soon.
It's better to enable ACPI_PROCESSOR on ARM64 only after we have all
these dependencies resolved. Until then we need to carry some patches
locally for testing.
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
