On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, July 06, 2015 05:05:29 PM Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 11:24 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > >> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Andy Shevchenko > > > >> > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> > > On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 12:31 +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > >> > > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > [] > > > > > > >> > > > Applied, thanks. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Hmm… Seems kinda mistake. I can't see this applied (and required > > > >> > > previous patches 4 and 5) to any of your branch neither in > > > >> > > (today's) > > > >> > > linux-next. > > > >> > > > > >> > New stuff applied after v4.1 couldn't show up in -next before v4.2 > > > >> > -rc1 was > > > >> > released (which just happened last night)? > > > >> > > > >> Might be, I would like to resend new version of my series and that's > > > >> why I would like to have a branch to check what is already applied. So, > > > >> if I can't see it does it mean it is brewed in the private repository? > > > > > > > > If you have patches that depend on this, they either need to come > > > > through my tree, or you have to wait until the next kernel version > > > > (which you probably don't want, right?). > > > > > > > > The alternative is that I unapply this patch and the whole lot can be > > > > sucked up by the most appropriate subsystem. > > > > > > I resent a new version for other comments(still with all patches > > > included). Meanwhile the patches 4-6 (from v4 or v5, where they are > > > the same) could be applied in the first place. Can you clarify what > > > exactly you have applied? The idea is to put the rest via your > > > subsystem since it's most appropriate for this series. > > > > Easiest thing for me to do is unapply. > > > > We can take the whole series when all the Acks have been accrued. > > So are there any ACKs missing from the last series posted by Andy? Yes, I have requested a Clk Ack, as there are some, lets say interesting code in the MFD driver which I am unsure about. However, we have caught Mike at an awkward time, as he is in the middle of transitioning jobs. Perhaps Stephen Boyd (now Cc'ed) might have a look. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
