On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 11:24 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 12:31 +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > > The newly introduced device_for_each_child_reverse() would be > > > > used > > > > when MFD > > > > core removes the device. > > > > > > > > After this patch applied the devices will be removed in a > > > > reversed > > > > order. This > > > > behaviour is useful when devices have implicit dependency on > > > > order, > > > > i.e. > > > > consider MFD device with serial bus controller, such as SPI, > > > > and > > > > DMA IP that is > > > > attached to serial bus controller: before remove the DMA driver > > > > we > > > > have to be > > > > ensured that no DMA transfers is ongoing and the requested > > > > channel > > > > are unused. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko < > > > > andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > Applied, thanks. > > > > Hmm… Seems kinda mistake. I can't see this applied (and required > > previous patches 4 and 5) to any of your branch neither in > > (today's) > > linux-next. > > New stuff applied after v4.1 couldn't show up in -next before v4.2 > -rc1 was > released (which just happened last night)? Might be, I would like to resend new version of my series and that's why I would like to have a branch to check what is already applied. So, if I can't see it does it mean it is brewed in the private repository? -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
