Re: [PATCH v2 01/22] fjes: Introduce FUJITSU Extended Socket Network Device driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 11:55 +0900, Taku Izumi wrote:
> This patch adds the basic code of FUJITSU Extended Socket
> Network Device driver.

trivial notes:

> diff --git a/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c b/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c
[]
> +static int fjes_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> +{
[]
> +	result =
> +	utf16s_to_utf8s((wchar_t *)str->string.pointer,
> +			str->string.length, UTF16_LITTLE_ENDIAN,
> +			str_buf, sizeof(str_buf) - 1);

I dislike this style as it's not normally used in the kernel.
Most would use another tab indent on the utf16s_to_utf8s line
if the line didn't fit, but this would is more common:

	result = utf16s_to_utf8s((wchar_t *)str->string.pointer,
				 str->string.length, UTF16_LITTLE_ENDIAN,
				 str_buf, sizeof(str_buf) - 1);
> 
> +	/* create platform_device */
> +	plat_dev =
> +	platform_device_register_simple(DRV_NAME, 0, fjes_resource,
> +					ARRAY_SIZE(fjes_resource));

	plat_dev = platform_device_register_simple(DRV_NAME, 0, fjes_resource,
						   ARRAY_SIZE(fjes_resource));

etc...

> +static acpi_status
> +fjes_get_acpi_resource(struct acpi_resource *acpi_res, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct resource *res = data;
> +	struct acpi_resource_address32 *addr;
> +	struct acpi_resource_irq *irq;
> +
> +	switch (acpi_res->type) {
> +	case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_ADDRESS32:
> +		addr = &acpi_res->data.address32;
> +		res[0].start = addr->address.minimum;
> +		res[0].end = addr->address.minimum +
> +			addr->address.address_length - 1;
> +		break;
> +
> +	case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IRQ:
> +		irq = &acpi_res->data.irq;
> +		if (irq->interrupt_count != 1)
> +			return AE_ERROR;
> +		res[1].start = irq->interrupts[0];
> +		res[1].end = irq->interrupts[0];
> +		break;
> +
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return AE_OK;
> +}

Is this function used in this compilation?
If not, it's odd to add code that isn't used.

Is it better to make the 2nd argument a
struct resource * rather than a void * ?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux