On Friday, June 19, 2015 11:38:28 AM Lv Zheng wrote: > ACPICA commit 7aa598d711644ab0de5f70ad88f1e2de253115e4 > > The root cause of the reported bug might be one of the followings: Care to describe the bug in the changelog too? And in a few following changelogs as well? > 1. BIOS may favor the 64-bit firmware waking vector address when the > version of the FACS is greater than 0 and Linux currently only supports > resuming from the real mode, so the 64-bit firmware waking vector has > never been set and might be invalid to BIOS while the commit enables > higher version FACS. > 2. BIOS may favor the FACS reported via the "FIRMWARE_CTRL" field in the > FADT while the commit doesn't set the firmware waking vector address of > the FACS reported by "FIRMWARE_CTRL", it only sets the firware waking > vector address of the FACS reported by "X_FIRMWARE_CTRL". -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
