Re: [PATCH v2] acpi-video: Add a parameter to not register the backlight sysfs interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 11 Jun 2015, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11-06-15 03:43, Aaron Lu wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:54:45PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 06/09/2015 11:10 AM, Aaron Lu wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:32:25AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>> On some systems acpi-video backlight is broken in the sense that it cannot
>>>>> control the brightness of the backlight, but it must still be called on
>>>>> resume to power-up the backlight after resume.
>>>>
>>>> All the video module does on resume is a backlight set operation, it
>>>> can't control backlight but can turn on the screen on resume? Hmm...
>>>>
>>>> I'll ask Sylvain to attach acpidump, let's see if there is anything
>>>> special there.
>>>
>>> Ok, lets see what comes out of that. Note in the mean time Sylvain has
>>> attached his acpidump.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> According to the discussion in the bugzilla place, it doesn't seem we
>> have any other way to handle this at the moment.
>>
>> Acked-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks. So that only leaves Jani's remark:
>
>  > Nitpick, I'd prefer positively named variables, like enable_foo to avoid
>  > the double negative !disable_foo. enable_foo and !enable_foo read much
>  > better. But up to Aaron and friends.
>
> I personally believe that having the option named disable_backlight_sysfs_if
> is better here since I believe that things which are always enabled except
> on a few broken model laptops the option name should be disable_foo so
> that people can clearly see in /proc/cmdline / dmesg that the user is passing
> an option to disable something which is normally enabled.

Fair enough.

>
> As for the (!disabled) argument, the code in question here actually is:
>
> if (disabled)
> 	return 0;
>
> :)
>
> Still if people want me to change the option to a default-on
> enable_backlight_sysfs_if option I can do a v3...

I'm not insisting.

BR,
Jani.


>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux