On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 03:24:02AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Document how the ACPI device enumeration code uses the special
> PRP0001 device ID.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
At last the long needed documentation regarding PRP0001 :-) Thank you
for doing this,
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
One typo found, see below.
> ---
> Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-pm/Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt
> +++ linux-pm/Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt
> @@ -359,3 +359,52 @@ the id should be set like:
> The ACPI id "XYZ0001" is then used to lookup an ACPI device directly under
> the MFD device and if found, that ACPI companion device is bound to the
> resulting child platform device.
> +
> +Device Tree namespace link device ID
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +The Device Tree protocol uses device indentification based on the "compatible"
> +property whose value is a string or an array of strings recognized as device
> +identifiers by drivers and the driver core. The set of all those strings may be
> +regarded as a device indentification namespace analogous to the ACPI/PNP device
> +ID namespace. Consequently, in principle it should not be necessary to allocate
> +a new (and arguably redundant) ACPI/PNP device ID for a devices with an existing
> +identification string in the Device Tree (DT) namespace, especially if that ID
> +is only needed to indicate that a given device is compatible with another one,
> +presumably having a matching driver in the kernel already.
> +
> +In ACPI, the device identification object called _CID (Compatible ID) is used to
> +list the IDs of devices the given one is compatible with, but those IDs must
> +belong to one of the namespaces prescribed by the ACPI specification (see
> +Section 6.1.2 of ACPI 6.0 for details) and the DT namespace is not one of them.
> +Moreover, the specification mandates that either a _HID or an _ADR identificaion
> +object be present for all ACPI objects representing devices (Section 6.1 of ACPI
> +6.0). For non-enumerable bus types that object must be _HID and its value must
> +be a device ID from one of the namespaces prescribed by the specification too.
> +
> +The special DT namespace link device ID, PRP0001, provides a means to use the
> +existing DT-compatible device identification in ACPI and to satisfy the above
> +requirements following from the ACPI specification at the same time. Namely,
> +if PRP0001 is returned by _HID, the ACPI subsystem will look for the
> +"compatible" property in the device object's _DSD and will use the value of that
> +property to identify the corresponding device in analogy with the original DT
> +device identification algorithm. If the "compatible" propoerty is not present
^^^^^^^^^
Should say 'property'.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
