On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 06:19:19PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 02:21:12PM +0000, Moore, Robert wrote: > > ACPICA usually defines any "related" data structures, just for user > > convenience. > > If you want to keep it, it's fine for me but we still probably use the > internal structure for it in tpm_crb driver (as tpm_tis uses internal > structure for CRB). Let me open this a little bit. Everytime we want to do some small change to control area (lets say TCG adds some flag) we would have to cycle them through you. And the changes are not coupled with ACPI in any possible way. This is only adds more maintenance burden to you and also to us. This structure is the main control structure for the CRB driver and will be refined many times in the future. There is no any kind of use to its fields outside of the CRB driver. /Jarkko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
