Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use acpi_video_unregister_backlight instead of acpi_video_unregister in platfrom backlight drivers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 02-06-15 11:59, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 01 Jun 2015, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi All,

I'm working on cleaning up the currently somewhat convoluted logic to
select which backlight interfaces to register on x86 systems, see:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2014-December/074687.html

For a rought outline (details will change in the actual patch-set).

These 3 patches are a preparation for that work, as the behavior of the
current code is not always consistent (it changes depending on module
loading order in some cases). These 3 patches remove this inconsistency
which in some cases may result in a behavior change.

This way the cleanup can have a consistent base to build upon, and I can
ensure that the cleanup itself does not cause any functional changes.

Thanks for doing this.

Slightly unrelated, but you'll end up calling:

acpi_video_unregister_backlight
	acpi_video_bus_unregister_backlight
		acpi_video_dev_unregister_backlight
			thermal_cooling_device_unregister

Uhm, err, what? What business does *that* have in the backlight
unregister call chain?!

I think the idea is that having the backlight on can cause the main board
to heat up as there is often a regulator / pwm for the backlight on the
main board. If that is turned off it may help to cool down the main board,
so the backlight is a cooling device in the sense that when it is turned
off it stops generating heat.

If this makes sense (*) then the cooling device stuff should maybe moved
from the acpi/video.c code to the backlight core code.

Or does the acpi-video code use some info from the BIOS to determine
whether or not to register a cooling device ?

Regards,

Hans




*) This is tricky, e.g. going low brightness may cause the main board
to heat up more then full brightness depending on how things are hooked
up.



 Should that be untangled from the mess too?

BR,
Jani.



I hope to post a v1 of the actual cleanup patch-set in 1-2 weeks.

Regards,

Hans
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux