RE: [PATCH 2/4] acpi: allow for an override to set _REV

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> OK, so do we have any proof that anything in addition to the sound thing is broken by returning 2 from _REV?
> 
> If not, then we're probably spending too much time discussing this.

>From a Dell perspective I'm not aware of anything else breaking, but I'll be sure to raise its attention and any associated details if I become privy to them.  I'm working with architecture to ensure that future products are not relying on _REV values as well.
I know Matthew had mentioned that another OEM's product was using this as well, but I don't know what for.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux