Then perhaps this is where the machine is violating the ACPI specification: 6.5.1 _INI (Init) The _INI method must only access Operation Regions that have been indicated to be available as defined by the _REG method. > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Goode [mailto:agoode@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 9:56 AM > To: Moore, Robert > Cc: Zheng, Lv; Lan, Tianyu; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devel@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Devel] Correct place to send patches? > > No, I did not see a _REG method defined in the code. > > > Adam > > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Moore, Robert <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Does the CMOS operation region have a _REG method? > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Zheng, Lv > > Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 11:03 PM > > To: Zheng, Lv; Moore, Robert; Adam Goode; Lan, Tianyu > > Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devel@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Subject: RE: [Devel] Correct place to send patches? > > > > > > > > Since no reply from Tianyu… > > > > What if we move _INI invocation out of ACPICA, and let OSPM to invoke > it. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > -Lv > > > > > > > > From: Devel [mailto:devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Zheng, Lv > > Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 8:33 AM > > To: Moore, Robert; Adam Goode; Lan, Tianyu > > Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devel@xxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [Devel] Correct place to send patches? > > > > > > > > You should discuss this in the linux-acpi mailing list where the Linux > > CMOS opregion driver is implemented, reviewed, and merged. > > > > Let me Cc Tianyu who is the original author of the CMOS opregion driver. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > -Lv > > > > > > > > From: Moore, Robert > > Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 10:25 PM > > To: Adam Goode; Zheng, Lv > > Cc: devel@xxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: RE: [Devel] Correct place to send patches? > > > > > > > > I’ll have to let Lv answer this question. > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Adam Goode [mailto:agoode@xxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 7:23 AM > > To: Moore, Robert > > Cc: devel@xxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [Devel] Correct place to send patches? > > > > > > > > The problem is that on new Apple hardware (Macmini7,1 and others), the > > system reads and writes from CMOS in _INI. With no CMOS handler, the > > Thunderbolt device doesn't initialize correctly. > > > > > > > > The current framework in Linux doesn't register the PNP* CMOS devices > > until after _INI runs. Do you have a suggestion on what to do in this > > case? Is it possible to register a device driver before _INI runs? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Adam > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Moore, Robert > > <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > Actually, I had a question about this. > > > > > > > > Given that the CMOS device has a _HID and requires a device driver > > (there can be multiple types of CMOS devices), in ACPICA we decided > > that we could not provide CMOS interfaces. > > > > > > > > What problem does this patch solve, and how will it work in the face > > of different CMOS devices? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Bob > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Devel [mailto:devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Adam Goode > > Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 4:53 AM > > To: devel@xxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [Devel] Correct place to send patches? > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Is this the correct place to send patches for review? I have a patch > > from a few weeks ago > > (https://lists.acpica.org/pipermail/devel/2015-May/000698.html) that I > > would like feedback on. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Adam > > > > > > > > ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
