Re: [RFC v1 10/25] sh: intc: Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant lookup of irq_desc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 20 May 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:

> Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant lookup of irq_desc while we
> already have a pointer to corresponding irq_desc.
> 
> Also replace generic_handle_irq with generic_handle_irq_desc() to avoid
> looking up irq_desc again.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/sh/intc/core.c |    2 +-
>  drivers/sh/intc/virq.c |   14 ++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/sh/intc/core.c b/drivers/sh/intc/core.c
> index 81f22980b2de..e4ca964ca840 100644
> --- a/drivers/sh/intc/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/sh/intc/core.c
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ void intc_set_prio_level(unsigned int irq, unsigned int level)
>  
>  static void intc_redirect_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
>  {
> -	generic_handle_irq((unsigned int)irq_get_handler_data(irq));
> +	generic_handle_irq_desc(irq, desc);

This looks wrong. It's a redirector of irq to some other irq.

     	redir_irq = (unsigned int)irq_get_handler_data(irq);

which should be:

        redir_irq = (unsigned int)irq_desc_get_irq_handler_data(desc);

And redir_irq is certainly not the same as irq. So this wants a
conversion to irq_desc_get_irq_handler_data() first. That makes the
irq argument unused.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux