On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 01:59:00AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, May 15, 2015 04:23:11 PM Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * pci_dma_configure - Setup DMA configuration
> > + * @pci_dev: ptr to pci_dev struct of the PCI device
> > + *
> > + * Function to update PCI devices's DMA configuration using the same
> > + * info from the OF node or ACPI node of host bridge's parent (if any).
> > + */
> > +static void pci_dma_configure(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = &pci_dev->dev;
> > + struct device *bridge = pci_get_host_bridge_device(pci_dev);
> > + struct device *host = bridge->parent;
> > + struct acpi_device *adev;
> > +
> > + if (!host)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (acpi_disabled) {
> > + of_dma_configure(dev, host->of_node);
>
> I'd rather do
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && host->of_node) {
> of_dma_configure(dev, host->of_node);
Nitpick: do we need the CONFIG_OF check? If disabled, I don't think
anyone would set host->of_node.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
