Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] ACPI / processor: always compile perflib if CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 08/05/15 09:52, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015年05月07日 02:36, Ashwin Chaugule wrote:
Hello,

On 6 May 2015 at 10:31, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Similar to the  idle, thermal and throttling libraries, always compile
the perflib if CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR is enabled. This not only makes
perflib alligned with other libraries but also helps in some sanity
testing of these ACPI methods even when a particular feature is not
enabled in the kernel configuration.

Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/acpi/Makefile    |  2 +-
   include/acpi/processor.h | 29 -----------------------------
   include/linux/cpufreq.h  |  4 ++++
   3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
index 8a063e276530..33aef9d8b260 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_BGRT)               += bgrt.o
   # processor has its own "processor." module_param namespace
   processor-y                    := processor_driver.o processor_throttling.o
   processor-y                    += processor_idle.o processor_thermal.o
-processor-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ)   += processor_perflib.o
+processor-y                    += processor_perflib.o

I'd prefer that we create a separate kconfig option for this. (perhaps
even default it to 'y'). This library is quite specific to a certain
type of CPU performance management methods (includes _PSS and friends)
which are superseded by CPPC. The OS is not expected to support both
at runtime, so by keeping this a config option, we can then disable it
at compile time when CPPC is enabled. We could couple

I agree. CPPC and _PSS are different way of controlling CPU freq,
and I think _PSS may not be used on ARM.


While I agree having a separate config option is good, but I won't
assume _PSS might not be used on ARM as I have seen patches posted on
the list in past to use _PSS on ARM platform[1].

Regards,
Sudeep

[1] http://marc.info/?l=linaro-acpi&m=139745485418399&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux