On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 05:56:19AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 03:45:52AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > And I don't really understand the Matthew's comment regarding limiting > > operation regions to system memory. This is about a specific operation > > region (which BTW only seems to be used as a means to access system memory > > at the location pointed to by the arg) in that particular method. > > My feeling was that it really ought to have been the ACPI code dealing > with this in some way, but having looked at it again I accept that this > is really something that's limited by the vendor implementation. > virt_to_phys() isn't the worst thing to do here. Thank you both for the follow-up here. Kast, You have some feedback from Corentin and myself on the basic driver, mostly around cleanups for legibility and future maintainability. You also have agreement to move forward with virt_to_phys() in the driver due to limitations imposed by the vendor AML. Please incorporate these changes in a v2 and resubmit the patch. Please keep all those who have provided feedback on Cc, and include them in the Cc lines of the patch itself (below your Signed-off-by). Thanks, -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
