Re: Request for additional arm64 branch in linux-next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:10:55AM +0000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Will,

Hi again Stephen,

> On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:20:03 +0000 Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > We've got a series of patches introducing ACPI support for arm64 that
> > are tentatively targetting the 4.1 merge window. Whilst there are
> > face-to-face discussions set to happen in the next day or so around this
> > topic, could you please pull this into linux-next under the assumption
> > that we decide to go ahead for mainline inclusion?
> > 
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/acpi
> > 
> > I've kept the series separate from the usual arm64 branch (for-next/core)
> > but they merge without conflicts. Merging with today's next, I see two
> > trivial Kconfig conflicts (resolution below).
> 
> Added from today (and thanks for the hints).  Will this be merged via
> another tree, or go directly to Linus?
> 
> > I'll let you know when the branch is no longer needed.
> 
> Excellent.

Just to say that, since the ACPI support code for arm64 was merged in the
recent merge window, this branch is no longer required and can be dropped
from linux-next.

Thanks,

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux