On Friday, April 17, 2015 09:35:30 PM Dan Williams wrote: > 1/ Autodetect an NFIT table for the ACPI namespace device with _HID of > "ACPI0012" > > 2/ Skeleton implementation to register an NFIT bus. > > The NFIT provided by ACPI is the primary method by which platforms will > discover NVDIMM resources. However, the intent of the > nfit_bus_descriptor abstraction is to contain "provider" specific > details, leaving the nd core to be NFIT-provider agnostic. This > flexibility is exploited in later patches to implement special purpose > providers of test and custom-defined NFITs. > > Cc: <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> So as discussed internally, nfit.h will have to wait for the ACPICA's NFIT support to prevent clashes from happening. Also please CC *all* *patches* with "ACPI" (or "acpi" etc) anywhere in the subject/changelog/body to linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. More comments likely to follow. Thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
