On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 03:49:33AM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2015/3/26 1:21, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:02:46PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > >> CPU hardware ID (phys_id) is defined as u32 in structure acpi_processor, > >> but phys_id is used as int in acpi processor driver, so it will lead to > >> some inconsistence for the drivers. > >> > >> Furthermore, to cater for ACPI arch ports that implement 64 bits CPU > >> ids a generic CPU physical id type is required. > >> > >> So introduce typedef u32 phys_cpuid_t in a common file, and introduce > >> a macro PHYS_CPUID_INVALID as (phys_cpuid_t)(-1) if it's not defined > >> by other archs, this will solve the inconsistence in acpi processor driver, > >> and will prepare for the ACPI on ARM64 for the 64 bit CPU hardware ID > >> in the following patch. > >> > >> CC: Rafael J Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Suggested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> > >> Reviewed-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> > >> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> > >> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> > >> [hj: reworked cpu physid map return codes] > >> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > BTW, am I still the author of this patch? If yes, it's missing a From: > > line. > > Oops, you should be the author, can Will fix this in his tree? Fixed. Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
