On 3/24/15 15:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, March 24, 2015 04:43:46 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 09:23:47AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
On 3/9/15 10:20, Mika Westerberg wrote:
[....]
diff --git a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
index e530533..9a42522 100644
--- a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
+++ b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
@@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ struct css_device_id {
struct acpi_device_id {
__u8 id[ACPI_ID_LEN];
kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
+ __u32 cls;
It would be nice if we could change ordering here but I understand that
it breaks quite many drivers. Perhaps we should consider creating
ACPI_DEVICE() macro and convert existing drivers to that at some point.
Yes, a roughly grep in the drivers directory showing about 112 files at the
moment. If you think this is the right approach going forward, we can work
on cleaning this up on a separate patch series. Please let me know what you
think.
I think having ACPI_DEVICE() macro would be pretty useful and it avoids
things like this if we need to add new fields in the future. Rafael has
the last word, though :-)
I agree.
Okay, how should I organize this big change? Can we do this as a
separate patch series?
Thanks,
Suravee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
