On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:08:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > If dev is NULL in __gpiod_get_index() and both ACPI and OF are > enabled, it will be checked twice before the code decides to give > up with DT/ACPI lookup, so avoid that. > > Also use the observation that ACPI_COMPANION() is much more efficient > than ACPI_HANDLE(), because the latter uses the former and carries out > a check and a pointer dereference on top of it, so replace the > ACPI_HANDLE() check with an ACPI_COMPANION() one which does not > require the additional IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) check too. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
