Re: [PATCH v9 07/21] ACPI / sleep: Introduce arm64 specific acpi_sleep.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, March 04, 2015 10:49:25 PM G Gregory wrote:
> On 4 March 2015 at 22:38, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 25, 2015 04:39:47 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >> From: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
> >> ACPI code will call acpi_target_system_state() for device power
> >> management, so introduce acpi_sleep.c to allow other drivers to function
> >> until S states are defined.
> >>
> >> Since it is arm64 specific stub holder, so let acpi_sleep.c to ARM64
> >> specific.
> >>
> >> TODO: merge this with drivers/acpi/sleep.c once we fix the specification.
> >>
> >> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>
> >> Tested-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Tested-by: Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Tested-by: Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Tested-by: Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Tested-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Acked-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile     |  2 +-
> >>  arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_sleep.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  drivers/acpi/Makefile          |  2 ++
> >>  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_sleep.c
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
> >> index 218eb7e..4435943 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
> >> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_KGDB)            += kgdb.o
> >>  arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_EFI)                      += efi.o efi-stub.o efi-entry.o
> >>  arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_PCI)                      += pci.o
> >>  arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ARMV8_DEPRECATED) += armv8_deprecated.o
> >> -arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI)             += acpi.o
> >> +arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI)             += acpi.o acpi_sleep.o
> >>
> >>  obj-y                                        += $(arm64-obj-y) vdso/
> >>  obj-m                                        += $(arm64-obj-m)
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_sleep.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_sleep.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..54578ef
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_sleep.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> >> +/*
> >> + *  ARM64 Specific Sleep Functionality
> >> + *
> >> + *  Copyright (C) 2013-2014, Linaro Ltd.
> >> + *      Author: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> + *
> >> + *  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> >> + *  it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> >> + *  published by the Free Software Foundation.
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * Currently the ACPI 5.1 standard does not define S states in a
> >> + * manner which is usable for ARM64. These two stubs are sufficient
> >> + * that system initialises and device PM works.
> >> + */
> >> +u32 acpi_target_system_state(void)
> >> +{
> >> +     return ACPI_STATE_S0;
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_target_system_state);
> >> +
> >> +int __init acpi_sleep_init(void)
> >> +{
> >> +     return -ENOSYS;
> >> +}
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> >> index 623b117..c32edf5 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> >> @@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ acpi-y                              += nvs.o
> >>
> >>  # Power management related files
> >>  acpi-y                               += wakeup.o
> >> +ifneq (,$(findstring $(ARCH),x86 ia64))
> >
> > This is super-ugly.  Isn't there a better way to do that?
> >
> Its the standard example in the GNU Make manual,

It is never used in the kernel this way, though, and I'm not going to let
that slip through.

> I would certainly love if someone had a batter suggestion.

Define ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP in drivers/acpi/Kconfig as

	config ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP
		bool
		depends on IA64 || X86

and build the file conditional on that.


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux