On 2015/2/25 16:40, Hanjun Guo wrote: > +Not yet implemented are: > + > + -- Section 10: power source and power meter devices > + > + -- Section 11: thermal management > + > + -- Section 12: embedded controllers interface > + > + -- Section 13: SMBus interfaces > + > + -- Section 17: NUMA support (prototypes have been submitted for > + review) > + > Here at the end of the file. Redundant blank line. > +ACPI is also important because hardware and OS vendors have already worked > +out how to use it to support the general purpose ecosystem. The infrastructure > +is in place, the bindings are in place, and the process is in place. DT does > +exactly what we need it to when working with vertically integrated devices, > +but we don’t have good processes for supporting what the server vendors need. > +We could potentially get there with DT, but doing so doesn’t buy us anything. > +ACPI already does what the hardware vendors need, Microsoft won’t collaborate > +with us on DT, and the hardware vendors would still need to provide two > +completely separate firmware interface; one for Linux and one for Windows. > + And Here at the end of the file. Redundant blank line. -- Thanks, Shannon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
