Re: regression in 4.0.0-rc1 with r8169 ethernet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> * v3.19 ignored [io  0x0cf8-0x0cff], but v4.0 includes it.  I think
> it's wrong to include it because that's the configuration space
> address/data registers, so it's consumed by the host bridge and not
> produced on the downstream side.
>
> * v3.19 includes [mem 0x7ff00000-0xfebfffff], but v4.0 does not.  This
> is what's screwing up the devices.
>
> I think all the windows should be marked as ACPI_PRODUCER in _CRS
> since the space is "produced" on the downstream side of the bridge.
> The [io  0x0cf8-0x0cff] region should probably be marked
> ACPI_CONSUMER, and maybe that accounts for why v3.19 ignores it.  But
> I haven't found the code that does that yet.
>
> I suspect this is all related to the ACPI resource parsing rework.  I
> looked through that briefly, but no issues jumped out at me, so this
> is just a heads-up in case it is obvious to you guys.
>
> Dave, it'd be useful if you could collect an acpidump so we can look
> at the _CRS data in more detail.

acpidump fails here with a /dev/mem warning in the kernel,

now I'm not near the machine again until next week most likely, so I
only have ssh for now,
and the kernel it is running for which I don't have the source anymore!

is there any of tables from /sys I can grab instead?

Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux