On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > Modify update_fast_timekeeper() to take a struct tk_read_base > pointer as its argument (instead of a struct timekeeper pointer) > and update its kerneldoc comment to reflect that. > > That will allow a struct tk_read_base that is not part of a > struct timekeeper to be passed to it in the next patch. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> Thomas was really behind the update_fast_timekeeper design so I'm not sure I can critique if this fits in the larger vision here, but I don't see anything wrong and its not breaking in any of my tests, so... Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
