On Friday, January 30, 2015 07:07:14 AM Xue, Ken wrote: > Hi Rafael, > I looked into your patch in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5677461/. > I found that "XXX_platform_notify" should be implemented separately in LPSS and APD driver instead of "acpi_soc_platform_notify" in acpi_soc. > Because there is WA can't be share with two drivers. And it can make LPSS or APD driver more flexible. > > Then only "acpi_soc_create_device" can be shared by LPSS and APD. Maybe, the meaning of acpi_soc becomes less than what we expected. > So, can we go back to two separated drivers without any binding? I don't want code duplication between them, though. So if there's a function that may be shared between them, it should be shared. And so on. No duplicate data structure definitions etc. > And try thoughts about acpi_soc, if there were more common features. As I said. If you can do that without code duplication, please feel free to try. -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
