On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > What is the reason to assume that DT is preferred over ACPI? I would > have thought that if ACPI is present, then it means we're on an ARM64 > server platform, and therefore it should be used. It seems silly to > require acpi=force on every ARM64 server platform. So it looks like there's a whole conversation about this already in this thread that I didn't notice. However, reading through all of it, I still don't understand sure why the presence of ACPI tables is insufficient to enable ACPI. In what situation would we want to ignore ACPI tables that are present? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
