Re: [PATCH 1/6] ACPI/EC: Cleanup transaction wakeup code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 07:28:22 PM Lv Zheng wrote:
> This patch moves transaction wakeup code into advance_transaction().
> No functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/ec.c |   17 +++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> index 1b5853f..3e19123 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static int ec_transaction_completed(struct acpi_ec *ec)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static bool advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec)
> +static void advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec)
>  {
>  	struct transaction *t;
>  	u8 status;
> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static bool advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec)
>  			t->flags |= ACPI_EC_COMMAND_COMPLETE;
>  			wakeup = true;
>  		}
> -		return wakeup;
> +		goto out;
>  	} else {
>  		if (EC_FLAGS_QUERY_HANDSHAKE &&
>  		    !(status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_SCI) &&
> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static bool advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec)
>  			t->flags |= ACPI_EC_COMMAND_POLL;
>  		} else
>  			goto err;
> -		return wakeup;
> +		goto out;
>  	}
>  err:
>  	/*
> @@ -262,14 +262,16 @@ err:
>  		if (in_interrupt() && t)
>  			++t->irq_count;
>  	}
> -	return wakeup;
> +out:
> +	if (wakeup && in_interrupt())
> +		wake_up(&ec->wait);
>  }
>  
>  static void start_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec)
>  {
>  	ec->curr->irq_count = ec->curr->wi = ec->curr->ri = 0;
>  	ec->curr->flags = 0;
> -	(void)advance_transaction(ec);
> +	advance_transaction(ec);

Well, this looks like a functional change, because we wouldn't call
wake_up(&ec->wait) here before.

>  }
>  
>  static int acpi_ec_sync_query(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 *data);
> @@ -304,7 +306,7 @@ static int ec_poll(struct acpi_ec *ec)
>  					return 0;
>  			}
>  			spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
> -			(void)advance_transaction(ec);
> +			advance_transaction(ec);

Ditto.

Or am I missing anything?

>  			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
>  		} while (time_before(jiffies, delay));
>  		pr_debug("controller reset, restart transaction\n");
> @@ -688,8 +690,7 @@ static u32 acpi_ec_gpe_handler(acpi_handle gpe_device,
>  	struct acpi_ec *ec = data;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
> -	if (advance_transaction(ec))
> -		wake_up(&ec->wait);
> +	advance_transaction(ec);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
>  	ec_check_sci(ec, acpi_ec_read_status(ec));
>  	return ACPI_INTERRUPT_HANDLED | ACPI_REENABLE_GPE;
> 

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux