On 01/16/2015 03:20 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:31:53PM +0000, Al Stone wrote: >> On 01/15/2015 11:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 >>>> >>>> I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this series queued up >>>> for v3.20? >>> [snip ... ] >> >>>> 5. Platform support patches need verification and review >>>> * ACPI core works on at least the Foundation model, Juno, APM >>>> Mustang, and AMD Seattle >>>> * There still are driver patches being discussed. See Al's summary >>>> for details >>>> * As I argued above, the state of driver patches isn't going to be >>> >>> We are still lacking here. To quote Al, "First version for AMD Seattle >>> has been posted to the public linaro-acpi mailing list for initial >>> review". Sorry but I don't follow linaro-acpi list. I don't know what's >>> in those patches and I can't tell which subsystems they touch, whether >>> maintainers agree with them. So in conclusion, I'm not confident the >>> arm64 hardware ACPI story looks that great yet. >>> >> >> This is solely my fault -- too much time on processes, email, and >> documentation, not enough time on the Seattle patches. And not >> enough Seattles to go around for someone else to pick up the slack. >> >> I am aware not everyone is subscribed to linaro-acpi; we use that >> for internal review before posting more broadly, which is the only >> reason I sent them there. >> >> I'm in the middle of updating them as I have time, based on really >> good feedback from Arnd; few of them are terribly new (the very first >> posting was [0]) -- it's mostly a matter of rebasing, integrating >> updates from AMD and others, and reacting to the comments. One can >> also see what these patches will probably look like via one of the >> Fedora kernel trees [1]. > > Do you have some simple branch against mainline with just the ACPI core > patches and what's required for AMD Seattle? I have no plans to dig > through the Fedora kernels. > Nor was I expecting you to; I only added it as additional reference material, should one be interested. The version of patches sent to the linaro-acpi list are from the Linaro acpi.git tree, and are precisely what you describe; those are the ones being updated. -- ciao, al ----------------------------------- Al Stone Software Engineer Linaro Enterprise Group al.stone@xxxxxxxxxx ----------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
